Auto saved by Logseq

journal/2022_04_30.md

@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@
 	- [[violent]] [[peaceful]]
 	- [[horrible]] [[beautiful]]
 - [[agora]]
-	- NOW write [[pkm book]] chapter abstracts
+	- DONE write [[pkm book]] chapter abstracts
 	  :LOGBOOK:
-	  CLOCK: [2022-04-30 Sat 16:20:08]
+	  CLOCK: [2022-04-30 Sat 16:20:08]--[2022-05-02 Mon 01:33:30] =>  33:13:22
 	  :END:
 		- [[agora abstract]]
 			- [[commons]]
@@ -49,11 +49,11 @@
 - [[big timer]]
 	- -> [[termdown]]
 - responded to [[maya]]
-<<<<<<< HEAD
+  <<<<<<< HEAD
 - [[5mg]]
 	- #push [[walter benjamin festival]]
 		- "people flock to [[marseille]] to consume [[hashish]] or some other form of [[cannabis]] in commemoration of the time [[walter benjamin]] did it."
-=======
+		  =======
 - reached out to [[jayu]]
 - [[we could be monks in space]]
->>>>>>> 11789e70e8e48f672e79e4a90efa9527655f3da5
+  >>>>>>> 11789e70e8e48f672e79e4a90efa9527655f3da5

journal/2022_05_02.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+- sent out [[the agora is a social knowledge graph]] to [[pkg book]] and [[ivo]].

the agora as a social knowledge graph.md

@@ -1,15 +1 @@
-- an [[agora abstract]].
-	- #push [[agora abstracts]]
-		- #pull [[social knowledge graph]] [[distributed knowledge graph]]
-		- An Agora is a [[distributed knowledge graph]] provisioned and maintained by a community as a [[commons]].
-			- Whereas a [[personal knowledge graph]] usually contain resources authored or collected by a single person, and a wiki usually contains resources produced by a community, an Agora is a [[social knowledge graph]] based on the [[integration]] of both personal and group resources.
-		- Being a graph, an Agora can be defined as a set of vertexes or [[nodes]] `V` (entities) and [[edges]] `E` (known links between entities, optionally annotated).
-			- Agora [[nodes]] are defined by the set of known resources *about* the entity described by their title.
-				- Put another way, an [[agora node]] is a community maintained [[collection]] of voice-preserving individual contributions by default.
-				-
-				- Note that Agora nodes generalize in turn to graphs defined in a local context around the [[subnodes]] represented by known resources.
-			- Note that because links in an Agora can be annotated (e.g. tagged or qualified by other nearby links), the Agora is in fact a [[hypergraph]].
-		- Individual agoras are expected to federate and organize into greater Agora networks, which are in themselves graph-like at a higher level.
-		- Some hypothesis that we are testing:
-			-
-		-
+- #pull [[the agora is a social knowledge graph]]

the agora is a social knowledge graph.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+- an [[agora abstract]].
+	- #push [[agora abstracts]]
+		- #pull [[social knowledge graph]] [[distributed knowledge graph]]
+		- An Agora is a [[distributed knowledge graph]] provisioned and maintained by a community as a [[commons]].
+			- The Agora can be said to be a [[social knowledge graph]] as it is a [[distributed knowledge graph]] produced in a social context and containing social information.
+			- Whereas a [[personal knowledge graph]] usually contains resources authored or collected by a single person, and a wiki usually contains resources produced by a group, an Agora contains and integrates both personal and group resources.
+			- Whereas a [[personal knowledge graph]] is usually maintained using a single [[personal knowledge management]] tool and stored in a single format, an Agora tends to be tool and format agnostic, trying to provide and follow the most general conventions.
+		- Being a [[graph]], an Agora can be defined as a set of vertexes or [[nodes]] `N` (entities) and [[edges]] `E` (known links between entities, optionally annotated).
+			- Agora [[nodes]] are defined by the set of known resources *about* the entity described by their title or other metadata.
+				- A [[node]] is a community-maintained [[collection]] of voice-preserving individual [[subnodes]] defined by the resources contributed by a certain user or group.
+			- Because links between two nodes in an Agora can be [[annotated]] (i.e. #tagged or qualified by other nearby links) and have multiplicity, the Agora is in fact a [[hypergraph]].
+			- Individual agoras are expected to federate and organize into greater Agora networks, which are in themselves graph-like at a higher level.
+		- On a system level, there exists a [[free]] and [[open source]] [[reference Agora]] that provides a minimum viable implementation for the [[underlay]], [[interlay]], [[overlay]] components of the [[distributed knowledge graph]].
+			- In the reference Agora, links can be said to [[fan out]] by default in the sense that they are evaluated in social context in individual contributions (resulting in following a link sometimes surfacing more than what the individual author envisioned.)
+			- We are using said reference Agora to refine the proposed system and run experiments.
+			- Some hypotheses that we are testing:
+				- Individual contributions can be made maximally useful to others on average when served best-effort in a social context at the only cost of adopting a default social stance (at little extra effort over baseline), and this mechanism benefits from network effects.
+				- A [[knowledge commons]] model can provide utility to participating communities efficiently, as the cost of systemic integrations with a hub design such as the Agora can scale with `O(N)` instead of the `O(N^2)` provided by a naive full mesh.
+				- Best effort social [[composition]] and [[integration]] of notes might be sufficient to surface yield higher level meaning and order, or at least significantly complement both taxonomic approaches (hierarchical) and individual-scoped eventual convergence (non hierarchical).
+					- A composition of personal [[hierarchies]] yields a social [[heterarchy]].
+					- The social context afforded by an Agora provides a path towards faster eventual convergence (that is, `K` people contributing to `N` nodes as categorized using loose or implicit personal ontologies can converge on useful emergent categories as `K` increases, at low individual effort).
+				- Going from a set of voice-preserving [[individual contributions]] to a shared [[group resource]] might be an efficient way to foster opportunistic collaboration at scale.