autopushed

This commit is contained in:
2023-07-04 15:25:31 +02:00
parent 5389b8ba45
commit 2c21a8de90
+7 -1
View File
@@ -13,4 +13,10 @@ Oh, it's because the developers refuse to accept patches to implement short form
Also, if you run `flatpak search` in a narrow terminal it will helpfully elide the full application ID, so flatpak search cannot even be depended on to retrieve the right incantation consistently. WHY.
##
## [[Systemd]]
I love Systemd; I remember curating SysV Init scripts and I think the process of writing Systemd services is much improved. Having said that :)
Why is it so hard to just make sure a service will actually start and keep retrying forever if it can't start? There are several incantations in the configuration spec that *seem* like they should achieve indefinite retries, but really don't (or do only in some cases). I understand why you'd want to have something like a sane retry policy (with backoff), but I really would like to tell it: just keep trying for me. Under no situation it seems reasonable for me to find a service marked as `inactive (dead)`, run start on it and have it work flawlessly. The computer should have done that for me.
Also, why