mirror of
https://github.com/flancian/garden.git
synced 2026-08-07 06:56:19 +00:00
autopushed
This commit is contained in:
@@ -13,4 +13,10 @@ Oh, it's because the developers refuse to accept patches to implement short form
|
||||
|
||||
Also, if you run `flatpak search` in a narrow terminal it will helpfully elide the full application ID, so flatpak search cannot even be depended on to retrieve the right incantation consistently. WHY.
|
||||
|
||||
##
|
||||
## [[Systemd]]
|
||||
|
||||
I love Systemd; I remember curating SysV Init scripts and I think the process of writing Systemd services is much improved. Having said that :)
|
||||
|
||||
Why is it so hard to just make sure a service will actually start and keep retrying forever if it can't start? There are several incantations in the configuration spec that *seem* like they should achieve indefinite retries, but really don't (or do only in some cases). I understand why you'd want to have something like a sane retry policy (with backoff), but I really would like to tell it: just keep trying for me. Under no situation it seems reasonable for me to find a service marked as `inactive (dead)`, run start on it and have it work flawlessly. The computer should have done that for me.
|
||||
|
||||
Also, why
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user