Affected files: .obsidian-git-data "Pasted image 20210621194707.png" "Pasted image 20210621194757.png" "discussing social annotation and digital literacies.md"
3.2 KiB
- a panel
- i annotate 2021
- slides https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EqIyenQPzfm_NMcJ63w6_TCeAXg5EG3f/view?usp=sharing
- nate angell introducing
- mary klann with
- jenae cohn cherise mcbride paul schacht
- ten minutes per presenter
jenae cohn
"but what do I do with a reading?"
digital reading: 5 ways of engagement
"when you are sewing, you usually follow a pattern. if you are more of an expert like a project runway contestant, you use patterns to guide you. social annotation provides scaffolding to engage with digital text."
digital literacy development in three parts by coiro 2015:
The most advanced users have "a self-directed confidence in transforming strategies used in more familiar contexts into new strategies that are more useful in less familiar literacy contexts."
Creation-driven prompts.
cherise mcbride
"making things visible: annotation and digital pedagogy"
It's an opportunity to have a conversation. It carries some risks. Social annotation is thinking publicly. Partnership with marginal syllabus.
Why to annotate? "It's an act of love because of one's commitment to stay in relationship with the creator and other readers and observers."
Risks:
Collegiality:
(Missed some slides here due to technical problems.)
paul schacht
Ways of annotating: explicate contextualize argue converse connect message opine.
gardner campbell i annotate 2019 on knowledge emotions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-uuWcmzpgw (thank you nate angell!).
Site was preseeded with annotated Walden:
Harding is interested in historical time, sees in numbers. More in the concrete than the abstract.
Debra's comment expresses a knowledge emotion plus says what's interesting about it, yet doesn't feel like a forced explanation:
prompts !



















