flancian
0b5abf0f55
Affected files: .obsidian-git-data "discussing social annotation and digital literacies.md"
6.0 KiB
- a panel
- i annotate 2021
- slides https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EqIyenQPzfm_NMcJ63w6_TCeAXg5EG3f/view?usp=sharing
- nate angell introducing
- mary klann with
- jenae cohn cherise mcbride paul schacht
- ten minutes per presenter
jenae cohn
"but what do I do with a reading?"
digital reading: 5 ways of engagement
!
"when you are sewing, you usually follow a pattern. if you are more of an expert like a project runway contestant, you use patterns to guide you. social annotation provides scaffolding to engage with digital text."
!
digital literacy development in three parts by coiro 2015:
!
!
!
The most advanced users have "a self-directed confidence in transforming strategies used in more familiar contexts into new strategies that are more useful in less familiar literacy contexts."
Creation-driven prompts.
!
!
cherise mcbride
"making things visible: annotation and digital pedagogy"
!
It's an opportunity to have a conversation. It carries some risks. Social annotation is thinking publicly. Partnership with marginal syllabus.
!
Why to annotate? "It's an act of love because of one's commitment to stay in relationship with the creator and other readers and observers."
!
Risks:
!
Collegiality:
!
(Missed some slides here due to technical problems.)
paul schacht
Ways of annotating: explicate contextualize argue converse connect message opine.
!
gardner campbell i annotate 2019 on knowledge emotions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-uuWcmzpgw (thank you nate angell!).
!
Site was preseeded with annotated Walden:
!
!
Harding's verbs: !
Other readers: !
Harding is interested in historical time, sees in numbers. More in the concrete than the abstract.
!
Debra's comment expresses a knowledge emotion plus says what's interesting about it, yet doesn't feel like a forced explanation:
!
prompts !
chris aldrich posted a feed: https://hypothes.is/search?q=%22reminds+me+of%22
courtney kleffman: "What occurs before and after the annotation moment also drives how students view its purpose within the learning process. I often ask student to engage in metacognitive reflection post social annotation. It's not graded, but leads to something else."
!
(great conversation in the panel and in the chat)
metacognition and reflection.
paul schacht have them look at other people's annotations. Have students rifle through their own past annotations; marks in their books. Try to characterize the marks that they made; think about what they were trying to accomplish
What's your favourite annotation tool?
- cherise mcbride
- private tool / LMS (sp?)
- jenae cohn
- note there is implications for handling some of the PII
- advantages to do this behind a login wall (so in a silo?)
- paul schacht
- google docs can work
- whatever platform is being used, the important thing is for students to have control over their comments
- lms might support that
- hypothes.is supports group-only access
- there can be some 'showcase' posts, but not shared by default (I missed if this referred to a specific tool)
- comment
- comments for wordpress are attached to paragraphs, not to arbitrary
- likes both ways for different reasons; sometimes at the paragraph level it can be easy to navigate
- (I agree)
- students have connected with scholars!
- cherise mcbride permission from authors is important
!
!
- nate angell frankenbook
- jenae cohn importance of students truly owning their annotations and notes
- learn tools, both supported by the institution and personal
- cherise mcbride crowdlaaers
- jenae cohn
@Flancian, I see your question in the Q&A and may not have a chance to respond out loud. I'll typically put citation managers, note-taking tools (e.g. Evernote, Notion, OneNote) in the toolkit
citation mangers tend to be Zotero, Mendeley, and, when I've worked at institutions with librarians that support it, RefWorks and EndNote
- paul schacht audrey waters's piece objecting on the fact that people were writing hypothes.is comments on their blog
- disabled her comments because of abuse
- then people started leaving hypothes.is annotations, she was displeased with that
- chris aldrich https://indieweb.org/annotation#Criticism
- flancian
- IMHO because there's no one size fits all, this implies that the moderation layer should be separate from the data/interlay layer
- essentially communities should run their own moderation layer
- as a commons