From e4210550f539a23212e08b403d46feeec73b8630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Flancian <0@flancia.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:32:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] autopushed

---
 2024-08-01.md | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/2024-08-01.md b/2024-08-01.md
index 0be9a4f5a..392e23a70 100644
--- a/2024-08-01.md
+++ b/2024-08-01.md
@@ -9,3 +9,5 @@
   - And it's just... a bit nonsensical, on top of the other criticisms. Why is the dad involved at all? He comes across as lazy. If this was an ad showing how the little girl can use Gemini to help her with her writing, it would feel a lot more natural/less problematic probably. It *is* true that kids are going to be using generative AI to learn how to write (presumably they are already doing this), and the ad could have shown some of that instead. Maybe this was considered but lawyers didn't want to show too young people using the technology for some reason, and we got the lazy dad as a compromise?
   - Anyway. Google ads are pretty bad on average these days IMHO, so I'm not super surprised.
 - Yesterday [[2024-07-31]] in the [[Fellowship of the link]] call [[Aram]] shared a nice article he wrote as part of the [[semilink]] activity we were experimenting with: [[the internet is a series of webs]].
+- [[Flancia]]:
+  - I wrote on the Agora today. This is a good day :)