From e3058fee12c93ce7a27d27c38fd663dab69d04c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Flancian <0@flancia.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 00:47:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] autopushed

---
 journal/2024-07-12.md | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/journal/2024-07-12.md b/journal/2024-07-12.md
index e08a03a27..23f977d21 100644
--- a/journal/2024-07-12.md
+++ b/journal/2024-07-12.md
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
 - threw [[261]]
   - leading to [[hex/10]] = [[271]]: es todo perfecto como es.
   - I realized [[hex/6]] = [[97]] is prime, the last I had yet to memorize below 100. That concludes a particular interesting sequence, I guess :) 
-    - The number of primes below 100 is perhaps interesting to know: 25.
+    - The number of primes below 100 is perhaps interesting to know: 25. So a fourth of the 100 first numbers are prime! Huh.
+    - Knowing up to 1000 would unlock getting a statistical feel of how quickly primes 'thin out'.
+    - Of course we can also count to 10: 4 primes below 10, so about two fifths.
+    - I think they thin out logarithmically but I'm not sure which base, I could look it up but maybe I'll think about it :)