From 8ee9079ddeb459f619beab608ae3f72b302a80bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Flancian <0@flancia.org>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 00:30:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] autopushed

---
 Open Letter to Google.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Open Letter to Google.md b/Open Letter to Google.md
index a00b3164b..14122bdc7 100644
--- a/Open Letter to Google.md	
+++ b/Open Letter to Google.md	
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ An Agora, in short, is a pro-social device which tries to be [[free]], [[fair]]
 
 Google is a corporation and a community of employees (traditionally "Googlers", assumed to be practicing "Googlyness" :) In this letter, we will comment on how Google was and how Google is, and what Google could be (again?). 
 
-Being mostly profit driven as of the time of writing, Google need not be free at all times; but in this letter I make the argument that, given its position of relevance at this stage of the evolution of the first known internet, it *should* be increasingly fair and democratic within its possibilities.
+Being mostly profit driven as of the time of writing, Google need not be free at all times; but in this letter I make the argument that, given its position of relevance and control at this stage of the evolution of the [[first known internet]], it *should* try to become increasingly fair ("democratic") within available market-reality-bound possibilities.
 
 # Google should consider becoming more democratic
 Most corporations have historically not been democratic at all; governance wise they tend to be (or become) highly hierarchical, in particular as they age and emergent hierarchies solidify and negotiate market pressures.