From 8894e4dee4640dea52a67a809a1d1d32758e9c89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Flancian <0@flancia.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 23:54:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] autopushed

---
 journal/2023-02-23.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/journal/2023-02-23.md b/journal/2023-02-23.md
index efbe6d299..f7e7e1917 100644
--- a/journal/2023-02-23.md
+++ b/journal/2023-02-23.md
@@ -21,3 +21,4 @@
     - Both takes are right in a way, but I think the second one feels a bit conservative to me whereas the first one feels liberal.
   - [[books]]
     - Isn't it funny we are at a point in which some discount [[LLM]]s as "just learning from a corpus and repeating/combining information found there" at the same time we regularly call books, in particular those read in our youth, formative? At the same time we can observe society to be thoroughly shaped by the language, culture, knowledge preserved and presented to us primarily in the form of [[books]]?
+    - But of course I'm fond of calling books the [[Slow Internet]].