From 7031252b0a80101c4b73eae9ca6d47363b28fde6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Flancian <0@flancia.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:02:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] autopushed

---
 how can we develop transformative tools for thought.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/how can we develop transformative tools for thought.md b/how can we develop transformative tools for thought.md
index fadcebaf3..4cea397df 100644
--- a/how can we develop transformative tools for thought.md	
+++ b/how can we develop transformative tools for thought.md	
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
   - [[kenneth iverson]] introduced the term [[tools for thought]] in [[notation as a tool of thought]] regarding [[APL]]
     - … except he didn't maybe? :) he uses [[tool of thought]] instead, consistently. 
     - The syntagm "for thought" doesn't appear even once in the paper.
+    - "of thought" seems to give thought *agency* in a way that is interesting? instead of sounding like the product of the tool.