From 117df7c9c6559b3eb15d393edea15289dc96e156 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Flancian <0@flancia.org> Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 01:27:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Auto saved by Logseq --- the agora as a social knowledge graph.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/the agora as a social knowledge graph.md b/the agora as a social knowledge graph.md index 79ea8eddd..01e5fee64 100644 --- a/the agora as a social knowledge graph.md +++ b/the agora as a social knowledge graph.md @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ - In the reference Agora, links can be said to [[fan out]] by default in the sense that they are evaluated in social context in individual contributions (resulting in following a link sometimes surfacing more than what the individual author envisioned.) - We are using said reference Agora to refine the proposed system and run experiments. - Some hypotheses that we are testing: - - Individual contributions can be made maximally useful to others on average when served best-effort in a social context at the cost of adopting a default social stance (at little extra effort over baseline), and this mechanism benefits from network effects. + - Individual contributions can be made maximally useful to others on average when served best-effort in a social context at the only cost of adopting a default social stance (at little extra effort over baseline), and this mechanism benefits from network effects. - A [[knowledge commons]] model can provide utility to participating communities efficiently, as the cost of systemic integrations with a hub design such as the Agora can scale with `O(N)` instead of the `O(N^2)` provided by a naive full mesh. - - Social [[composition]] and [[integration]] of notes might be sufficient to yield higher level meaning and order, or at least significantly complement both taxonomic approaches (hierarchical) and individual-scoped eventual convergence (non hierarchical). + - Best effort social [[composition]] and [[integration]] of notes might be sufficient to surface yield higher level meaning and order, or at least significantly complement both taxonomic approaches (hierarchical) and individual-scoped eventual convergence (non hierarchical). - A composition of personal [[hierarchies]] yields a social [[heterarchy]]. - The social context afforded by an Agora provides a path towards faster eventual convergence (that is, `K` people contributing to `N` nodes as categorized using loose or implicit personal ontologies can converge on useful emergent categories as `K` increases). - Going from a set of voice-preserving [[individual contributions]] to a shared [[group resource]] might be an efficient way to foster opportunistic collaboration at scale. \ No newline at end of file